Breakaway Live...

    follow me on Twitter

    Monday 19 November 2007

    The Magic Puck...

    Just a side note to Sunday's games-it's amazing how people can change their views depending on whether its their side affected by an incident or not-Blaze's fifth goal on Saturday has seen the debut of a new phenomenon-the shot which defies the laws of physics, as produced by Adam Calder. The goal can be seen here (you will need Realplayer to view it)-it's the fifth Blaze goal. Watch the way the puck comes away from the goal in the slow-motion replay...quite impressive, really. Those who claim a goal say that the puck went in at the right post, round the rim at the bottom and back out-some feat considering the puck was rising and managed to miss the protruding back-bar on the way round, and managed to turn itself through nearly ninety degrees coming back across the line.
    Others say it pinged off the right post, into the back bar, and back off the left post. Either way, this is what could have happened...

    Either the puck has:
    a) managed to hit the right post, curve through the air behind the line, hit the inside of the left post without dropping or losing speed and come back out (in which case the goal-judge at that end is in the wrong job, cause he has the eyes and 3D spatial vision of a fighter pilot and the reactions of a bullet-catcher to see all that from directly behind, through the plexi, and react, which with the best will in the world I doubt, given that I usually stand just to his left),

    b) the puck has somehow managed to hit the right post at just the right angle to reflect perfectly onto the back bar (even more impressive given that physics tells us Calder would need to be about four feet to the left of where he was when the shot came in for the puck to approach at the correct angle), defy a 45 degree downward deflection to rise off the back pipe and hit the inside of the left post on its way back out on a perfect angle with the goal-line (which is physically impossible given the angle it would be approaching at off the back bar),
    or c) it never went in in the first place.

    When you look at it like that, you've got to take c, really...:) I very much doubt that would have been given if it had been a shot on Koenig's net, somehow...

    Anyway..enough of the science bit..:)

    No comments: